Yes... I'm Big-Timing You...

Ladies and Gentlemen, Great Scott! Baker! is making the big jump. I've gone to a hosted website. I'm still figuring out the nuts and bolts. I don't think I'll be able to move my entire archive over, but I will be able to provide a far more dynamic blog and website. So head on over to:

www.greatscottbaker.com


Right now I'm planning on moving some of my more popular or useful posts from this blog over there as reposts in the next few weeks so that they'll be archived there. Look for my posts about the Hippodrome to be sure.

Also, I'm still working on enabling comments, so check back in a bit and I pray your patience!

And check out my new projects! I'm starting a new blog called "Sermons in Stones" which will be commentary on the complete works of William Shakespeare from a theological perspective. Check out the first post there for a fuller explanation. And I'm starting a podcast! Well... two actually. One will be an extension of my two blogs, the other will be discussions about William Shakespeare in American Sign Language. I'm not aware of such a resource currently existing, so I'm hoping to provide something useful and entertaining there.

Well that's the big news from me! Please head on over, bookmark it, RSS subscribe, and enjoy!

Mother's Day

First of all, let me say: I love my mother. I love her to pieces. I always will. She's the best.

Okay? Clear enough? Let there be no doubt.

Because here's the rub: I'm not nuts about Mother's Day. Or about Valentine's Day. Or about any "day" or "holiday" that is set aside for us to celebrate that which we should already be doing at all times. I would hope that without Mother's Day my mom would still be fully aware that I love her. And I don't need February 14th for Beeki to know that I love her. Because I show it every day. That's the way it should be.

But the problem goes to the heart of what I've been talking about lately with the recent floods and the National Day of Prayer: our words matter. We are responsible for the words of our mouths. And we are responsible for the extensions of those words. Even the unspoken extensions. The problem I have with Mother's Day is that it logically diminishes the importance of women who haven't had children. There's no celebration for the infertile. Or the celibate. Or the women whose children died before being born. And that's not right. The way we celebrate Mother's Day is also necessarily difficult for mothers whose children have died before them. Or for those with terrible mothers. Or for mothers of either damaged or difficult children. And that's a problem for me.

Now, before you get too mad at me, (and I can just hear it now, "First the National Day of Prayer and now Mother's Day?!?! What kind of evil heathen is this?!), remember that we're not talking about an article of faith. We're not talking about a biblical concept. If anything, my notion that celebrating our mothers is something we should do at all times without regard to special occasion is far more biblically grounded. These are holidays that are managed by people selling cards and flowers and chocolates, and that bothers me. These are modern American constructs that are due no more reverence and regard than we are willing to give them.

So, of course, I send my mother and mother-in-law cards and flowers. I love them! And I wouldn't for a second want for them to think otherwise. But I would hope that they know, day in and day out, that my love isn't tied to a holiday. And it's not conditional. And it's not conditioned. It's genuine and deep.

At any rate, Anne Lamott says all of this better than I do. Which is no surprise; she says almost everything better than almost everyone. You can see the article she wrote for Salon.com here.

Have a good week and look for a significant announcement in the next day or so!

The National Day of Prayer

Yesterday was apparently the National Day of Prayer. I've been listening to commercials for it on the radio in the past few weeks. The people talking have mostly been pastors of large churches. And I've tuned them out for the most part. So it wasn't until yesterday was half over and I read this wonderful post by my friend Stephen Lamb that I remembered that it was the National Day of Prayer.

Honestly, the whole idea just strikes me as silly. Why Christians would or should need a National Day of Prayer escapes me. The idea should be offensive to us. If we are what we say we are, then we are already practicing a national day of prayer every day. Prayer is not an occasional event. It is a constant inflow and outflow. It is the effortless communication and the labored plea. It is the petition and the praise. It is the learning and the being. It is the silence and the cry. And it is constant. It makes about as much sense to me to declare a National Day of Breathing.

Unfortunately, while we're still being honest, no one expects that the National Day of Prayer is simply an extension of the normative Christian discipline. It is a special occasion. And it is not one open to individual interpretation. It is a calculated and cultivated effort to promote a view of the United States as a "Christian nation" and to promote American militarism.

I fully understand that there is a generational and political divide with regard to the issue of America being a "Christian nation." I don't expect everyone to agree on this, but I cannot and will not let go of my questions in response to such an assertion. The first is, "What part of America was Christian while we were committing genocide and stealing land from the indigenous population of North America?" And the second is, "What part of America was Christian while we were enslaving an entire race of foreigners brought here against their will to enrich us?" The obvious answer is neither act could be construed as testimony to our Christianity. Were Christians at the head of the formation of our country? Of course they were. But in no way could our nation, or any nation, be considered Christian. A Christian is a person, not a place or a thing. And to quote Rob Bell, "Christian" makes a wonderful noun and a terrible adjective.

I can appreciate that what I've said is not sufficient to change the mind or heart of someone who is convinced that America is somehow "Christian." But what cannot be denied is that the National Day of Prayer is propaganda in support of such a view. For proof, one need look no further than the website for the National Day of Prayer: www.nationaldayofprayer.org. There it clearly says that one of the values of the National Day of Prayer is to "Publicize and preserve America’s Christian heritage." The fact that it presupposes such a thing as true is patently obvious.

Perhaps more disturbing than that is the way that the National Day of Prayer is being shamelessly used to promote American militarism. Pastors are bold and unashamed in calling for prayers for American victory in Iraq and Afghanistan. This is troublesome on multiple levels. The first is that it presupposes that "victory" in Iraq and Afghanistan were a good thing. Someone like me, a devout Christian myself, might argue that it is an offensive notion and that we shouldn't even be engaged in military action in those other nations in the first place. And before I get accused of being anti-America, (or worse: liberal), let me inform or remind that my father served in the US Air Force for 30 years and his father served in WWII before that. My father was stationed in the Middle East during conflict. The best way to protect the lives of our soldiers is not to pray for their "victory," it's to get them out of the path of the bombs and bullets in a land in which we have no business.

The second way in which it is troublesome, though, is best not told by me. And it really goes to the heart of my objections to the obvious goals of the "National Day of Prayer." And it also brings me back to my friend Stephen. He quotes Mark Twain's short story/letter to the editor, "The War Prayer." I'll post it here below. It ties in to some of what I was expressing earlier this week about how the words we say in prayer and about God really do matter.

The War Prayer by Mark Twain
written approximately 1904-05

Editorial Note: Outraged by American military intervention in the Philippines, Mark Twain wrote this and sent it to Harper’s Bazaar. This women’s magazine rejected it for being too radical, and it wasn’t published until after Mark Twain’s death, when World War I made it even more timely. It appeared in Harper’s Monthly, November 1916.

It was a time of great and exalting excitement. The country was up in arms, the war was on, in every breast burned the holy fire of patriotism; the drums were beating, the bands playing, the toy pistols popping, the bunched firecrackers hissing and spluttering; on every hand and far down the receding and fading spread of roofs and balconies a fluttering wilderness of flags flashed in the sun; daily the young volunteers marched down the wide avenue gay and fine in their new uniforms, the proud fathers and mothers and sisters and sweethearts cheering them with voices choked with happy emotion as they swung by; nightly the packed mass meetings listened, panting, to patriot oratory which stirred the deepest deeps of their hearts, and which they interrupted at briefest intervals with cyclones of applause, the tears running down their cheeks the while; in the churches the pastors preached devotion to flag and country, and invoked the God of Battles beseeching His aid in our good cause in outpourings of fervid eloquence which moved every listener. It was indeed a glad and gracious time, and the half dozen rash spirits that ventured to disapprove of the war and cast a doubt upon its righteousness straightway got such a stern and angry warning that for their personal safety’s sake they quickly shrank out of sight and offended no more in that way.

Sunday morning came — next day the battalions would leave for the front; the church was filled; the volunteers were there, their young faces alight with martial dreams — visions of the stern advance, the gathering momentum, the rushing charge, the flashing sabers, the flight of the foe, the tumult, the enveloping smoke, the fierce pursuit, the surrender! Then home from the war, bronzed heroes, welcomed, adored, submerged in golden seas of glory! With the volunteers sat their dear ones, proud, happy, and envied by the neighbors and friends who had no sons and brothers to send forth to the field of honor, there to win for the flag, or, failing, die the noblest of noble deaths. The service proceeded; a war chapter from the Old Testament was read; the first prayer was said; it was followed by an organ burst that shook the building, and with one impulse the house rose, with glowing eyes and beating hearts, and poured out that tremendous invocation

God the all-terrible! Thou who ordainest! Thunder thy clarion and lightning thy sword!

Then came the “long” prayer. None could remember the like of it for passionate pleading and moving and beautiful language. The burden of its supplication was, that an ever-merciful and benignant Father of us all would watch over our noble young soldiers, and aid, comfort, and encourage them in their patriotic work; bless them, shield them in the day of battle and the hour of peril, bear them in His mighty hand, make them strong and confident, invincible in the bloody onset; help them to crush the foe, grant to them and to their flag and country imperishable honor and glory —
An aged stranger entered and moved with slow and noiseless step up the main aisle, his eyes fixed upon the minister, his long body clothed in a robe that reached to his feet, his head bare, his white hair descending in a frothy cataract to his shoulders, his seamy face unnaturally pale, pale even to ghastliness. With all eyes following him and wondering, he made his silent way; without pausing, he ascended to the preacher’s side and stood there waiting. With shut lids the preacher, unconscious of his presence, continued with his moving prayer, and at last finished it with the words, uttered in fervent appeal, “Bless our arms, grant us the victory, O Lord our God, Father and Protector of our land and flag!”

The stranger touched his arm, motioned him to step aside — which the startled minister did — and took his place. During some moments he surveyed the spellbound audience with solemn eyes, in which burned an uncanny light; then in a deep voice he said:

“I come from the Throne — bearing a message from Almighty God!” The words smote the house with a shock; if the stranger perceived it he gave no attention. “He has heard the prayer of His servant your shepherd, and will grant it if such shall be your desire after I, His messenger, shall have explained to you its import — that is to say, its full import. For it is like unto many of the prayers of men, in that it asks for more than he who utters it is aware of — except he pause and think.

“God’s servant and yours has prayed his prayer. Has he paused and taken thought? Is it one prayer? No, it is two — one uttered, the other not. Both have reached the ear of Him Who heareth all supplications, the spoken and the unspoken. Ponder this — keep it in mind. If you would beseech a blessing upon yourself, beware! lest without intent you invoke a curse upon a neighbor at the same time. If you pray for the blessing of rain upon your crop which needs it, by that act you are possibly praying for a curse upon some neighbor’s crop which may not need rain and can be injured by it.

“You have heard your servant’s prayer — the uttered part of it. I am commissioned of God to put into words the other part of it — that part which the pastor — and also you in your hearts — fervently prayed silently. And ignorantly and unthinkingly? God grant that it was so! You heard these words: ‘Grant us the victory, O Lord our God!’ That is sufficient. the whole of the uttered prayer is compact into those pregnant words. Elaborations were not necessary. When you have prayed for victory you have prayed for many unmentioned results which follow victory — must follow it, cannot help but follow it. Upon the listening spirit of God fell also the unspoken part of the prayer. He commandeth me to put it into words. Listen!

“O Lord our Father, our young patriots, idols of our hearts, go forth to battle — be Thou near them! With them — in spirit — we also go forth from the sweet peace of our beloved firesides to smite the foe. O Lord our God, help us to tear their soldiers to bloody shreds with our shells; help us to cover their smiling fields with the pale forms of their patriot dead; help us to drown the thunder of the guns with the shrieks of their wounded, writhing in pain; help us to lay waste their humble homes with a hurricane of fire; help us to wring the hearts of their unoffending widows with unavailing grief; help us to turn them out roofless with little children to wander unfriended the wastes of their desolated land in rags and hunger and thirst, sports of the sun flames of summer and the icy winds of winter, broken in spirit, worn with travail, imploring Thee for the refuge of the grave and denied it — for our sakes who adore Thee, Lord, blast their hopes, blight their lives, protract their bitter pilgrimage, make heavy their steps, water their way with their tears, stain the white snow with the blood of their wounded feet! We ask it, in the spirit of love, of Him Who is the Source of Love, and Who is the ever-faithful refuge and friend of all that are sore beset and seek His aid with humble and contrite hearts. Amen.

(After a pause.) “Ye have prayed it; if ye still desire it, speak! The messenger of the Most High waits!”

It was believed afterward that the man was a lunatic, because there was no sense in what he said.


I'll leave this subject by saying I obviously do not object to praying on the National Day of Prayer. No call to prayer should ever be ignored, and no opportunity to commune with other believers in prayer to God should be ignored. But we should be wary of ulterior motives in calls that have to do with nationalism. And we should remember that our words have meaning. They have consequences. And we are absolutely responsible for the extensions of those words and thoughts.

And if you are looking for an occasion for prayer, I would guide you to my friend Shaun's post today for a healthy dose of perspective. Why Christians feel the need to feign persecution, invent outrage, and drum up resentment will never make sense to me. In the course of this life, hardship and tragedy will come. We don't need to look for it, and we don't need to conflate relatively lesser pains in to large ones in order to mitigate the guilt of our comfort.

Pray for those truly in need. Even on the National Day of Prayer.

A Recent Conversation with my Friend Cliff

My dear friends Cliff and Elizabeth, (better known on this blog as Boscoe and Beffy), recently gave birth to their first child, a son. Little Gareth is wonderful and beautiful, but he had a little problem with his esophagus that required he undergo surgery on just the third day of his little life. Well the doctors got him all fixed up and everyone was praying that when they tested his esophageal connection today that there would be no leaks. We got the good news earlier this morning that there were no leaks and they're looking to take the little guy home soon.

So the news went down via text message like this:

Boscoe: Gareth is LEAK FREE! Now pray he figures out how to eat so we can bring him home.

Me: He's your kid. He'll figure out how to eat. And if he doesn't go for milk, offer him venison.

Boscoe: Maybe I should take him to Waffle House.

Me: You'll both be leaking if you do that.


Our most heartfelt and sincere congratulations to Boscoe and Beffy and little Gareth. Congratulations, guys!

A Whole 'Nother Blog

Hey all, just thought I'd update you on another blog in which I'm participating. I've been living "primally" for about a month now. The nutshell version of that means that I'm taking a different approach to eating, exercise, and some other lifestyle aspects. I got on this kick after reading Mark Sisson's book The Primal Blueprint. He also maintains an excellent daily blog called Mark's Daily Apple. He'll explain things much better than I could. Essentially, his thesis is that our bodys evolved to their current form eating lots of veggies, fruits, and meats but no grains. So that's the absurdly reduced nutshell version of it.

So far, I've lost 17 lbs., had more energy than ever, been sleeping better, and myriad other health benefits. Beeki's doing it too. She's lost weight and has all the same health improvements that I've seen. My mom's doing it too and has lost 20 lbs. and gotten off her blood pressure medication. Beeki's dad and brother are doing it too and reporting great results so far.

So we decided to start a family blog. We'll be talking about our experiences, posting recipes and links, and encouraging each other. If you've got any interest, feel free to read along. If you don't care... well... join the majority of humanity. It won't hurt my feelings.

I hope you're all doing well! I'm actually working on some other news about another new blog... stay tuned!

"God's blessings are mysterious sometimes..."

This past weekend Nashville was flooded by over 18" of rain in some places. There was massive flooding, damage, houses lost, lives lost, roads closed, schools closed, and businesses destroyed. It was bad.

Two things have stuck with me though. And not in a good way. See, I can handle tragedy and devastation. They are part of the human condition. Part of existence. To a certain extent, and in an oddly sad way, normal. But I know that not everyone sees it that way. Which is why I'm wondering where are the voices of the so-called Christians blaming these floods and disasters on someone's monstrous sin? Where are Pat Robertson and John Piper blaming Nashville's gay people? Or is Nashville so "Christian" thanks to the SBC presence, Lifeway, and CCM that this must be punishment for someone else's sins?

Then today I was listening to the radio and the radio show host was telling a story about how he was trying to buy a house in one of the areas that is now underwater. He says he and his wife put in an offer on the house but someone else snuck one in right before them. And now that house was completely underwater. He finishes the story by saying, "God's blessings are mysterious sometimes."

I think my jaw literally fell open. It shouldn't have. I should be used to these kind of fatalistic, simplistic, and thoroughly un-Christian understandings of God by now, but they still catch me off guard. Our words matter. But too often we act like they don't. We don't think about the things that come out of our mouths. Robertson and Piper must in the end be roundly condemned for their words because they should know better. Of course, I know the radio guy was just trying to express gratitude for something that he thought was a bad thing at the time turning out to work good for him. But we can't just let words like his slide! In order for what he said to be true, then God must have decided to bless him by making sure that the other people bought a house that he later planned to sink underwater. I'm sure the radio guy wouldn't agree with that, but it is nonetheless what he said.

I'm reminded of a conference I went to a few years back. It was hideous in so many ways, but what comes to mind now is that the worship leader spoke full-time without engaging his brain. It led him to say things like, "We're going to sing and wait for God to show up." As if a) God were absent up until that time or b) that God's presence were dependent upon his singing. (For the record, if God "showing up" were dependent upon his singing, it would have been a very pagan conference.)

If it feels like I'm nitpicking, I'm not. This is much more than mere semantics. Our words have power. And they reveal our theology. Jesus addresses this kind of backwards thinking in Luke 13:1-5. I don't know what justification there could be for proclaiming a tornado, hurricane, or flood as the judgment of God after hearing Jesus say, "...those eighteen who were killed when the tower of Siloam fell on them - do you think that they were worse offenders than all the others living in Jerusalem? No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all perish just as they did."

Tragedy and loss are part of the human condition. Sending the tragic circumstances or using a curse on someone else in order to bless you are not, however, part of the divine condition.

Scott Does Ballet

I've been working out, eating right, and dropping weight nicely. I'm in better shape than I've been in quite a while. That said, I still haven't done ballet in about twenty pounds. But I performed with the Nashville Ballet a few weeks ago. Okay, technically, I didn't dance with them. But I can still say I performed with them. And I've got video to prove it. So here it is:

http://sitemason.vanderbilt.edu/news/video/2010/04/15/watch-nashville-ballet-a-midsummer-nights-dream.112872

That's me as Oberon, then Bottom, then Oberon again. First people talk about the Nashville Ballet's Midsummer, then I perform, then people dance, then they talk, then I perform, then they dance, then they talk, then I perform, then they dance, then they talk again.

Be well!

Summary

I apologize for the delay in wrapping up my series on the Waco Performing Arts Company. Since I was last posting, I've dealt with a computer crash, the purchase of a new computer, some auditions, a lot of jobs, and a few other things that interrupted my thought process. Sorry again, but I'll wrap it up here.

Rather than summarize everything that I've posted, I'll just leave it up for you to read. Here I want to talk about what will actually make this all happen. The truth is, everything that I've laid out here is entirely achievable. It's possible, it's practical, and it's do-able. But its fate lies in the many hands of the people of Waco. You see, I had a philosophy during my time at the WPAC: I believed that if the success of the organization rose and fell on my presence, then I had failed that organization. The thing is, a responsibility like the success of the Arts in a city can't be left on the shoulders of one person. It's a recipe for failure. This is the kind of thing that requires many hands on deck.

The Board of Directors of the WPAC have done a heroic job keeping activities going as long as they did. They finished the season, which seemed impossible not too long ago. And they've organized quite a bit in the meantime. But they need help. They're going to need additional Board members. They're going to need people to serve on committees. They're going to need feedback and criticism. They're going to need volunteers. They're going to need audiences. They're going to need sponsors. They're going to need donors. They're going to need people to help tell their story and spread the word. In other words, they're going to need you. There's something for everyone to do, no matter your age, your experience, your talent, your ability, your availability, or your resources.

There's a very good chance if you're living in Waco that you know someone involved with one of the Arts groups that I've listed. If so, now is the time to encourage them to start considering this plan. Now is the time to start sowing seeds of resource sharing, collaboration, cooperation, advocacy, and organization.

This plan is being forwarded on to the WPAC Board of Directors in a formal manner at their request. How long it takes to implement is quite up in the air. But a number of details here are directly in your control. Make it your collective will to accomplish as many of those things as possible. And remember that what I said earlier is still true, Waco will be exactly the city that it wants to be. It's up to you to make it that city. Good luck and God bless

Posts Interrupted

I apologize for the delay here in finishing this series of posts! I promise I'm very close! But my computer crashed. I'm hoping I can fix it today or tomorrow, but the computer may not cooperate. More soon, even if I have to borrow a computer to finish up!

Truth Telling

Carl Hoover posted an article to his blog today about other Texas theatres facing programming problems this season. It fully confirms what I've said about the current season of the Waco Performing Arts Company. It's also an amusing exclamation point for my tongue-in-cheek reply to someone who absurdly tried to use my words in my previous post about programming to suggest that I was somehow badmouthing the people of Waco. The reason some people are willfully ignorant is always a mystery to me...

At any rate, programming for presenting houses is a difficult and interesting challenge. Theatres all over the country are facing it right now. I also think there's something else at play here. Not only are fewer good new shows available, but I think that during times of economic and/or social strife, people tend towards the artistic equivalent of comfort food. And the thing about comfort food is that everyone knows it's not the right thing for you. It won't make you feel better, it won't nourish you, and there's no chance it will improve your outlook. Same goes for "comfort Art." But really, and I've spoken about it before, my thoughts about comparisons of parallels between Americans' attitudes towards food and Art is a whole other post.

Also, if you're not already following me on Twitter, you can either click here or click on the link to the right. Hope you all have a great weekend.

Step Six

In my last post I took a look at a proposal for a fundraising plan. But renovating the building is only one component of the future financial needs of the Waco Performing Arts Company and the new coalition that is being built. So I wanted to take a look at other revenue streams and needed changes. And you thought we were done talking about money, didn't you? Step Six is planning for ongoing income needs.

The fundraising plan laid out in the last post is a good foundation on which to begin to look to other sources of funding. The TIF might not be the first organization that pops into your head when you think of financial support for the WPAC, but every dollar that doesn't need to be raised through programming, fundraising events, or donations is a dollar in the right direction. So the TIF can be a very helpful tool in the big picture of the WPAC's finances. It's limitation, of course, is that since its focus is on physical improvements, it cannot be depended upon for long-term support.

As many of you know, the WPAC is one of four groups that receives Hotel/Motel tax revenue from the City. That money technically goes through the Greater Waco Arts Council, which is responsible for recommendations about its distribution. A longstanding agreement has it so that the Hotel/Motel tax revenue is equally distributed among the WPAC, the Waco Symphony, the Waco Arts Center, and the Waco Civic Theatre. Criteria was established to determine who would receive the funding a number of years ago, and it has been renewed since. The grand total of money distributed from the tax revenue is roughly $120,000 per year. That's nearly $30,000 per organization. My first recommendation for additional financial support is that the Greater Waco Arts Council re-examine its criteria for funding and reconsider equal distribution. The budgets of the four organizations are vastly different as are the scope of the audiences impacted. Of course, I would argue that the WPAC reaches the largest audiences and employs the most local resources and is therefore most deserving of an increase, but that decision will lie with the GWAC. Perhaps an annual review that funded in response to the scope of activities and budgets proposed would be in order. They could establish a system that gave unequal portions in proportion to the different organizations' levels of activity. I would consider that especially vital under the new circumstance by which the WPAC is playing host and co-producer to all of Waco's various Arts organizations.

But examining the distribution is not enough. The City must be lobbied to increase its support for the Arts. A total annual contribution of $120,000 is just not sufficient to ensure that the Arts are an area of growth in Waco. Now I know that the City has offered support in other ways in the form of public maintenance and assistance in land purchase, but an ongoing increased financial support is needed. And there should be no problem with receiving organizations being held to even higher standards of accounting, financial planning, and education in exchange for increased support. But larger cities known for their Arts work for that reputation in the form of local government assistance. Considering the service the WPAC will be offering the City under the plan that I am proposing, an increase should be well in line.

I would expect the funding to continue to be funneled through the GWAC, which is why I mentioned it first. Such a regulatory and oversight body is needed to hold the various groups accountable for wise governance and expenditures, not just to forward along checks. I would hope that this idea would excite people and encourage them to participate in building a stronger GWAC that exercises greater influence in supporting local Arts.

Another body that could offer support is Public Improvement District #1. I sat on the Board of this organization while I was in Waco and chaired the Merchant Support and Economic Development committee. Their bylaws prohibit them from spending money that benefits one member of the PID, so what I would propose instead is that the entire PID adopt and embrace the full calendar of events that would be occurring at the Hippodrome and help to fund publicity for them in such a way as to benefit all of the members of the PID. After all, when a successful WPAC is promoting events that bring hundreds of people downtown every week, all merchants and businesses will benefit from the increased traffic.

Finally, I believe that it is necessary to negotiate greater support directly from the City of Waco. As I've mentioned earlier, the City is heavily involved in financially supporting recreational entities that draw traffic and tourism to the city such as Cottonwood Creek Golf Course, the municipal softball fields, the water park, and the Cameron Park Zoo. That last one is of particular importance to me because I see a rejuvenated WPAC that hosts all of Waco's various Arts organizations as having a similar impact in the city as the zoo. I don't know the exact figure of support that is given to the zoo, but I have been made aware that it is significantly greater than the $120,000 currently given to the Arts. I think the City needs to be directly engaged to increase its support for the WPAC more along the lines of their support for the zoo. With a renovated building, a coalition of all the various performing groups, the plan that I am proposing here in place, and increased financial support from the City, there is no reason that the WPAC couldn't have a similar impact as the zoo on the cultural life of Waco.

Ongoing financial support is a significant challenge, and one that must be addressed before a shovel hits the ground. This post only represents the beginning of the issue. The private foundations still need to be consulted about ongoing support. That is one area in which Waco is certainly behind other cities. Most Arts organizations in America have a handful of foundations that provide ongoing support on an annual basis. So far the attitude from foundations in Waco is that the Arts groups should be able to survive without such support if they are to be considered successful. That always struck me as a bit odd considering that by definition, a non-profit Arts organization is making something available at below market-value because it makes the community a better place in which to live. By that definition, it is going to require many sources of outside funding. And foundations who have as a part of their mission the goal of supporting non-profit Arts organizations should be open, in my opinion, to committing to ongoing annual financial support.

In addition to increased revenue, there are ways to decrease expenditures, which amounts to the same thing. Waco's various businesses have generally been pretty good about supporting the Arts in terms of in-kind service donations, but more is needed. Everything from accounting to marketing to building maintenance can be donated by a local business in exchange for promotional consideration, tax write-offs, or both. Some of those services are currently donated, but more can be done and the business community needs to be proactive in offering themselves. (I would love to take this opportunity to single out the Waco businesses who already do a stellar job of supporting the Arts, but I would invariably omit someone. Just ask a non-profit who their supporters are; they're only too happy to crow about them.) There is an inherent inequality of power between a professional service provider and a non-profit organization that must seek donated services. For the most part, everyone agrees to play the game together where the non-profits go all over town seeking what they need in an endless chase to get their needs met. But really, there's no need for it. Especially not in a city the size of Waco. The business community must be willing to step forward and relieve that tension. It's time for everyone to get involved.

So that is Step Six. Obviously, there are many more ways that financial support can and must be raised than I have examined here. But these are the big obstacles, and the ones that need to be worked out ahead of time. I am aware that I have piled yet another herculean task on to the current load. But this is what it will take to secure a future for the Arts in Waco. I hope that it is becoming apparent that no matter who you are in Waco, there is a role for you to play in supporting the Arts. Please let me know if you think I'm off base here, or if you think I've overlooked anything. As I frequently say, feedback and criticism are the only way to improve plans such as the one I'm laying out here. Let's work on solutions together.

Step Five

We're starting to have a cohesive plan for the future here! Up to this point we've detailed an end vision, organized the interested parties, defined a working agreement for the various organizations, and reorganized the Waco Performing Arts Company. At this point we should be able to create a full business plan to explain what we are trying to create. This business plan is not another step in and of itself. It is just a reflection and summation of the previous four steps. It will be crucial going forward, since it will be the foundation for the necessary fundraising efforts. It will include a description of the new internal business structure, a list of all interested parties and their business structures, a three-year projection of all proposed programming, lists of all of the Boards of Directors involved, and a copy of the proposed physical renovations. All of this will be referred to hereafter as the "Development Plan" which will be necessary for Step Five: Fundraising.

I'll admit, this one is sticky. Honestly, there's going to be more speculation involved with this step than any other. And that's because the best that can be created at this point is a fundraising plan. And fundraising plans have to be adaptive to reality and they have to be able to react to unexpected changes. So as a premise, let me say that any and all parts of this plan are subject to change. They build off of each other in such a way that if one step over- or under-performs, changes will need to be made to all subsequent steps. So here is my proposed skeleton for a fundraising plan.

Right now the estimate for renovating the Hippodrome, which is the necessary prerequisite for making this plan viable, is approximately $2.5 million. We will use that figure for the fundraising plan, but honestly the plan itself wouldn't necessarily change even if that figure were twice as high. The first step in the fundraising plan is to approach the TIF Board. (A detailed description of exactly what the TIF is would be beyond the scope of this post. More information can be found at this link by scrolling down to the section on "Downtown Development Incentives.") The TIF fund is a pool of money built from growth increments in sales taxes within a set geographic perimeter that is set aside for reinvestment within that perimeter. The Hippodrome sits within TIF Zone 1. Also in the zone are the Dr Pepper Museum, the Texas Sports Hall of Fame, and the Texas Ranger Museum. All three of those organizations have received grants in excess of $1 million from the TIF for renovations and expansions. There is no reason that the Hippodrome shouldn't similarly receive such a grant. This is an oversimplification of what the process will entail, but it is the first step. It will require an application, cultivating the application with the TIF Board and City staff, and waiting for a TIF recommendation and City Council vote. But the proposal should be for approximately 50% of the cost of the project, or for the sake of our example, $1.25 million.

That leaves $1.25 million to raise. The next step is to approach the major foundations in Waco who have stated goals of supporting the Arts. These foundations will include the Rapoport Foundation, the Waco Foundation, the Cooper Foundation, and the Meyer Foundation. I would submit that no project that has ever been submitted to these foundations could have a greater impact on the Arts in Waco than renovating the Hippodrome for the sake of the fulfillment of the Development Plan. With half of the project already funded by the TIF, the foundations would be asked to account for half of the remaining cost, or $625,000. This wouldn't be too large of a burden for them to collectively bear, especially if it could be spread over a couple of years to pay some contractors for renovation work.

Now the remaining amount to be raised is $625,000. At this point the leading families of Waco should be approached with the Development Plan. Numerous people have stepped up asking what they could do to help. This would be the time to engage them. Waco is fortunate to have some very generous citizens who have the resources to contribute significant funds. What should be asked is for them to collectively issue challenge grants for half of the remaining amount, or $312,500. These challenge grants will be commitments to match donations dollar-for-dollar. So if a family were to pledge $20,000, they wouldn't give it until $20,000 had been raised in donations. It's a powerful incentivizing tool for fundraising.

That incentive will be what is brought before the people of Waco. No general fundraising should be done until this point. With the above steps completed, the fundraising mission that needs to be brought to Waco through all of the various groups that stand to benefit is just $312,500. That money will complete a $2.5 million renovation project that will benefit all of the Arts in Waco for generations to come.

Like I said above, I know that this is the most speculative part of the step-by-step plan, but it has to be at least planned here. You have to begin with a plan that can be adapted later. At any rate, it is how I would approach a goal as big as $2.5 million. I would hope that each victory along the way would inspire more cooperation and participation from everyone interested and everyone who stands to benefit. I'll continue soon with Step Six as we are getting to the end of the plan!

Also, as a final note, if you haven't caught the April issue of the Wacoan, my earlier posts are printed there. I haven't seen it yet, but I hope that they are generating good discussion and some excitement as well. Right now, the most important thing you can do for the Arts in Waco is to talk about them with friends and neighbors and keep the tone hopeful. The future is bright!

Step Four

Thank you to all of you who have been sticking with me on this exploration of the future of the Arts in Waco. After spending some time a few weeks ago taking a look at the past of the organization and seeing what brought it to its current state, the past two weeks have seen me detailing my step-by-step plan for a new vision and business plan going forward.

Now, it must be appreciated that the changes that I'm proposing are by no means small. Truly, I'm proposing a fundamental change to the Waco Performing Arts Company's mission. I've explained before that the WPAC is a presenting organization. That means they don't create the shows that play at the Hippodrome Theatre. Rather they contract with shows that are touring the country to come to Waco and then facilitate that presentation. At its heart, my proposal is that the WPAC expand its operations from solely presenting to also co-producing performances from a wide variety of performing Arts groups in Waco. They'll be responsible for helping to schedule, sell tickets, manage technical needs, and administer the performances. What this means is that the organization as it currently exists is going to have to adapt. It won't look exactly like it did before. So Step Four for the WPAC is to reorganize their operations.

The first change that must be made to the WPAC is in programming. In recent years, the WPAC has been best known for presenting Broadway musicals. That time has past. Big touring Broadway musicals, while popular and of very high professional quality, don't fit on the Hippodrome stage and don't fit in the WPAC budget. (I've already gone over the financial and physical impossibilities in another post.) Moreover, the decision to remove the popular Broadway shows from the WPAC's programming is a bit of a line in the sand. A modern performing arts center is needed in Waco, and until it is constructed, Waco shouldn't have to make do with seeing those great shows crammed into a space that can't accommodate them. This goes back to my earlier point about not settling for good enough when it stands to cost you getting what you really need.

But there are still a great number of shows with good variety and high quality that the WPAC can continue to present. The children's series can and must stay. And in the past, the Broadway shows were supplemented by various special events. Those will now take center stage for the WPAC's programming. That means shows with minimal set and tech requirements and a price point between $10k - $15k. Shows like this season's Celtic Crossroads and Take 6, or past shows like Second City, Defending the Caveman, Five by Design, and Michael Martin Murphey. A variety of music and comedy with some small-scale theatrics thrown in as well. It won't be as aggressive of a schedule, but with the calendar filled in by all of the other performing groups in town, it shouldn't be perceived as a light schedule either.

The next change is in administration. With such a change in priorities and activities, the focus of the leadership of the organization is going to have to shift from primarily programming and audience development to primarily community building and grant writing. Although leadership will always have to deal with a broad spectrum of issues, it will require a shift in resources and focus to keep all of the various performing groups together, cooperating, and happy. It will also require a more diverse funding scheme than currently exists. This is a different kind of administration, but with the new operational model I think it is a sensible shift in focus.

The next change is in staffing. This is largely in response to the administrative changes. Before, the staff consisted of a full-time Executive Director, a full-time Technical Director, a full-time Box Office Manager, a part-time Office Manager, and a part-time Education Director/House Manager/Box Office Assistant/Everything Else. That staff is going to have to contract a bit and restructure. The new operations will still require a full-time Executive Director and a full-time Technical Director. But that Executive Director will primarily be responsible for Administration and Development, as detailed above. The Box Office should reduce hours so that it is only open two days a week plus show days. All ticket-buying traffic should be sent to the website with all other customer service being handled on the designated days. That would allow a contraction of positions to create a full-time position of Box Office Manager/Marketing Director/Education Director. The fourth and final position would be the part-time Office Manager to handle billing, scheduling, accounts receivable, and facility rental. That smaller staff should be able to handle the new demands of the organization until another growth step is achieved at a later date.

The final change to examine is the change that will have to come to the WPAC's Board structure. The current Board of Directors functions fine for the WPAC, but with the organization serving as an umbrella for a large number of other organizations, a sub-Board will need to be created with representatives from all of the different groups to coordinate scheduling, facilitate resource sharing, and unify advocacy positions for mutual self-interest. Although it wouldn't be invested with the authority to make final decisions affecting the WPAC and the Hippodrome, they would be viewed as an advisory Board to the WPAC with their input being very highly valued. Other interested parties should probably be considered for seats on this Board as well, such as a representative of the City and the Greater Waco Arts Council. This kind of broad Arts participation is exactly what Waco needs and is precisely what is currently missing.

So that's Step Four: reorganizing the WPAC's operations. And as I said above, these changes aren't minor. Some of them are not only difficult in and of themselves, but they require altering the 20+ year mission of the WPAC. But it is a focused and nimble organizational structure that would be prepared to tackle the diverse needs of such a collaborative framework. I'll be back soon with Step Five as we work towards a new vision for the Arts in Waco coming to fruition.

Holy Week

Just wanted to post a note here to let you all know that I'll be taking a short break from blogging about the action steps to revitalize the Performing Arts in Waco until next week.

Holy Week is the most sacred season of the Christian calendar, and it is my favorite time of year. I'll be focusing as much as possible on the meaning of the Resurrection for the world today during this weekend. I'll be attending a seder this evening at my church, singing in a service of darkness tomorrow for Good Friday, and preparing for Easter Sunday.

I pray peace and blessing on all of you. I'll catch you next week.

Step Three

On Monday I continued my series on the steps that the Waco Performing Arts Company needs to take in order to renovate the Hippodrome Theatre, reorganize themselves, and revitalize the Arts in Waco. The first step was envisioning the end goal and the second step was to organize. The next step is to define the arrangement that will exist between the WPAC and the various Arts organizations in Waco.

The name of the game when structuring an arrangement between all of the different organizations and the WPAC is barrier removal. There are some obvious impediments to arranging such a dream scenario as having all of Waco's Arts organizations performing together under one roof. Here are my thoughts on it.

The first barrier is cost. The reason that this idea is valuable in the first place is that it removes the most important barrier facing all of the different groups: the cost of renting a venue. So we began with the premise that such a barrier must be removed. The venue has to be provided free in order for the arrangement to be attractive. Of course, the WPAC has built-in costs as well. It can't just completely surrender profit from events that require the time and resources of the theatre and its staff. So the basic proposal is twofold: shift the cost to the back-end of the deal and reduce income expectations.

To the former, in lieu of charging the organizations a fixed rental fee, the WPAC will charge ticket fees. It should come in the form of a per-ticket fee and a percentage of the ticket price. Exactly what those numbers should be will need to be negotiated between the WPAC and the organizations. I think variation in fees and percentages should be tied to ticket price rather than to the type of show or which organization is presenting. This structure should allow the WPAC to collect an approximate amount to a conventional rental contract, but it doesn't require the Waco Arts organizations to front that money or bear any risk in it.

For a quick mathematical example, let's say that Organization X is having an event. They price their tickets at $10 each and anticipate an audience of 500 people. Just for the sake of this example, we'll say that the agreement is that the WPAC takes $2 per ticket and 25% of ticket revenue. (We'll assume that Organization X is actually only taking $8 per ticket so that after the fee the total ticket price rounds out at $10.) If 500 tickets are sold, that's $2000 for the WPAC and $3000 for Organization X. $2000 is close to what the WPAC could make on a conventional rental contract and $3000 profit after renting a facility is more than most Arts organizations in Waco could currently anticipate. Of course, if only 200 ticket sell, that's $800 for the WPAC and $1200 for Organization X. Bear in mind that the WPAC still gave up its space for rehearsal, provided technical support, sold tickets, and ran the event. They bear the risk in this and stand to make less than the value of their commitment. Of course, both organizations make more money when more tickets are sold. That kind of upside is shared by both and provides a nice incentive for collaboration. And I would imagine that the percentage that the WPAC takes could go down if the ticket price was higher. But again, my numbers were just for the sake of this example. What they will actually be will have to be worked out when the organizations meet as I detailed in Step Two.

The latter concession that the WPAC is making is reducing income expectations. This comes in a few forms. First of all, the WPAC will have to allow the organizations to use the space next door, which will be renovated as rehearsal space, for their rehearsals a reasonable amount of time. (I'll detail the physical changes to come in a later post.) And a dress rehearsal will have to be provided in the theatre. Since the WPAC is taking all of its compensation on the back-end of the deal, this usage won't be paid for. And it likely won't be compensated as much as it would be under a conventional rental agreement. But the hope is that it will make up for such losses with an increase in volume of performances and increased sales to its own shows due to greater exposure to all of the new audiences who will be brought to the Hippodrome. That's a pretty long-viewed approach to income, and frankly it's one that most theatres don't risk taking. I think it makes sense in this situation, and it's one that will pay dividends in the long run. And short-term thinking has been at the root of many problems with the Arts.

The final component in this step of defining the agreement is what I'll call the application process. Use of the Hippodrome isn't automatic nor is it perpetual for any Arts group in Waco. Parameters must be established and an application must be renewed annually. This is a way to ensure dedication and quality and provide dependable information on an ongoing basis.

What exactly will qualify someone to submit an application will have to be decided by the interested parties and the WPAC. I would propose that sensible beginning parameters might be registered 501(c)3 organizations, active in Waco for at least 3 years, with at least two public events performed within the past 12 months, and which serves an average of more than 1000 people per year. But that, of course, will also have to be determined by the interested parties.

The application will require each organization to describe themselves, their projects, and performances with respect to the following categories: merit, collaborations, educational commitment, local resources used, a description of the performance(s), sponsors, their marketing plan, and other sensible information. This is not only informational to make sure that everyone is on the same page. First of all, it ensures that all of the organizations are taking these points to heart. Requiring them to enunciate their marketing plan ensures that they have a marketing plan. Everyone needs to conduct themselves as professionally as possible since the sustainability of the whole relationship hangs on the quality of the performances, the frequency of the performances, and the size of the audiences.

But maybe more importantly than coordination and quality control is that having the above information can help the WPAC to write grants. This kind of city-wide partnership is rare and unique. It is definitely grant-worthy since so many foundations place a premium on sharing resources and collaborative efforts. The hope would be that by drawing all of these groups together under one roof, encouraging them to collaborate in some ways and forcing them to in others, and requiring that they all take ideas such as resource sharing to heart that you would have a dynamic environment that fostered creative ways to save money, combine administrative necessities, align programming, and reduce redundancy. By being the conduit through which these kinds of efforts were made, the WPAC could apply for grant assistance to help fund this project. That assistance would go a long way to help cover any shortage caused by committing time and resources to bringing this vision into reality.

So Step Three was defining the arrangement between the WPAC and the various Arts groups. In order to offer the Hippodrome for free to them, there will have to be a back-end agreement to help bring in funds for the WPAC. Each group will have to go through an application process in which they must enunciate their plans and qualifications for using the space. This will help to make them a partner with the WPAC and the other groups in the space so that coordinated efforts can be made in programming, scheduling, marketing, and administration. These efforts will hopefully result in increased grant support for the WPAC which is making them possible.

Next up, we'll take a look at how these changes will affect the WPAC. Obviously, these are some pretty fundamental changes, so we'll want to examine how the WPAC will adapt to handle them. I hope you can appreciate that this is becoming a pretty big project! But I also hope that you are starting to see that it can be handled one step at a time.